首页> 外文OA文献 >Mosquito bite immunization with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites: safety, tolerability, protective efficacy and humoral immunogenicity
【2h】

Mosquito bite immunization with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites: safety, tolerability, protective efficacy and humoral immunogenicity

机译:辐射减毒的恶性疟原虫子孢子的蚊虫叮咬免疫:安全性,耐受性,保护功效和体液免疫原性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: In this phase 1 clinical trial, healthy adult, malaria-naïve subjects were immunized with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites (PfRAS) by mosquito bite and then underwent controlled human malaria infection (CHMI). The PfRAS model for immunization against malaria had previously induced >90 % sterile protection against homologous CHMI. This study was to further explore the safety, tolerability and protective efficacy of the PfRAS model and to provide biological specimens to characterize protective immune responses and identify protective antigens in support of malaria vaccine development.\ud\udMethods: Fifty-seven subjects were screened, 41 enrolled and 30 received at least one immunization. The true-immunized subjects received PfRAS via mosquito bite and the mock-immunized subjects received mosquito bites from irradiated uninfected mosquitoes. Sera and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected before and after PfRAS immunizations.\ud\udResults: Immunization with PfRAS was generally safe and well tolerated, and repeated immunization via mosquito bite did not appear to increase the risk or severity of AEs. Local adverse events (AEs) of true-immunized and mock-immunized groups consisted of erythaema, papules, swelling, and induration and were consistent with reactions from mosquito bites seen in nature. Two subjects, one true- and one mock-immunized, developed large local reactions that completely resolved, were likely a result of mosquito salivary antigens, and were withdrawn from further participation as a safety precaution. Systemic AEs were generally rare and mild, consisting of headache, myalgia, nausea, and low-grade fevers. Two true-immunized subjects experienced fever, malaise, myalgia, nausea, and rigours approximately 16 h after immunization. These symptoms likely resulted from pre-formed antibodies interacting with mosquito salivary antigens. Ten subjects immunized with PfRAS underwent CHMI and five subjects (50 %) were sterilely protected and there was a significant delay to parasitaemia in the other five subjects. All ten subjects developed humoral immune responses to whole sporozoites and to the circumsporozoite protein prior to CHMI, although the differences between protected and non-protected subjects were not statistically significant for this small sample size.\ud\udConclusions: The protective efficacy of this clinical trial (50 %) was notably less than previously reported (>90 %). This may be related to differences in host genetics or the inherent variability in mosquito biting behavior and numbers of sporozoites injected. Differences in trial procedures, such as the use of leukapheresis prior to CHMI and of a longer interval between the final immunization and CHMI in these subjects compared to earlier trials, may also have reduced protective efficacy. This trial has been retrospectively registered at ISRCTN ID 17372582, May 31, 2016.\ud
机译:背景:在此1期临床试验中,通过蚊虫叮咬,用辐射减毒的恶性疟原虫子孢子(PfRAS)对健康的成年疟疾未成年人进行免疫接种,然后进行受控的人类疟疾感染(CHMI)。以前,针对疟疾的免疫接种的PfRAS模型已经诱导了针对同源CHMI的> 90%无菌保护。这项研究旨在进一步探索PfRAS模型的安全性,耐受性和保护功效,并提供生物学标本来表征保护性免疫反应并鉴定支持疟疾疫苗开发的保护性抗原。\ ud \ ud方法:筛选了57名受试者,招募了41位,至少30位接受了一次免疫。真正免疫的受试者通过蚊虫叮咬接受PfRAS,而模拟免疫的受试者从辐照的未感染蚊虫接受蚊虫叮咬。结果:PfRAS免疫通常是安全且耐受性良好的,通过蚊虫叮咬进行的反复免疫似乎不会增加AE的风险或严重性。真正免疫组和模拟免疫组的局部不良事件(AEs)由红斑,丘疹,肿胀和硬结组成,与自然界中蚊虫叮咬的反应一致。两名受试者,一名真免疫接种者和一名模拟免疫接种者,发生了完全解决的大型局部反应,很可能是蚊唾液抗原的结果,出于安全预防措施,退出了进一步的研究。全身性AE一般罕见且轻度,包括头痛,肌痛,恶心和低烧。两名真正免疫的受试者在免疫后约16小时出现发烧,不适,肌痛,恶心和严酷。这些症状可能是由于预先形成的抗体与蚊唾液抗原相互作用而引起的。用PfRAS免疫的10名受试者进行了CHMI治疗,另外5名受试者(50%)被无菌保护,其他5名受试者的寄生虫血症显着延迟。尽管受保护者和非受保护者之间的差异对于这种小样本量而言在统计学上无统计学意义,但所有十名受试者在CHMI之前均对全子孢子和环子孢子蛋白产生了体液免疫反应。试验(50%)明显少于先前报道的(> 90%)。这可能与宿主遗传学的差异或蚊子叮咬行为的固有变异性以及所注入子孢子的数量有关。与先前的试验相比,这些受试者在试验程序上的差异(例如在CHMI之前使用白细胞分离术以及最终免疫和CHMI之间的间隔更长)也可能降低了保护效力。该试验已在2016年5月31日在ISRCTN ID 17372582中进行回顾性注册。\ ud

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号